In today's world, where responsibility and social awareness are in the spotlight, it’s bloody frustrating to see the persistent gap between what people, organisations or companies say and what they actually do. Many companies and institutions scream their commitment from the rooftops or in fancy posters to show how they value diversity and inclusion, yet their actions often fail to follow through on these promises. This disconnect is particularly damaging for neurodivergent individuals, who are left vulnerable and unsupported. Don't get me wrong, there are some amazing advocates for neurodiversity inclusion in the wider world and we should seek them out to emulate their amazing work, but they prove the exception to the rule. I don't think it's malicious in every case, I think it comes from a place of naivety where there isn't enough understanding to follow through with the genuine support and changes needed.
Substance Over Lip Service
"Substance over lip service" is more than just a catchphrase; it’s a call to action. It emphasises the need for genuine commitment rather than hollow promises. Unfortunately, many organisations excel at saying the right things about neurodiversity but fall short when it comes to implementing effective support measures.
When companies only pay lip service to the concept of inclusion, they create a facade of progress that can be dangerously misleading. One-off workshops and awareness campaigns may be held, and policies may be written, but without substantive actions to back them up, these efforts are meaningless. There needs to be an embedding of continued professional development (CPD) as the diagnosis rates and cultural awareness around neurodiversity grows. This superficial approach leaves neurodivergent individuals feeling alienated and unsupported, struggling to find the resources they need to succeed.
The Harm of Lip Service
Lip service can often do more harm than good. By creating a false sense of security and progress, it masks the real issues that neurodivergent people face daily. This lack of substantive action not only fails to address their needs but also exacerbates their challenges, leaving them to rely on a small, overburdened network of champions who are already stretched thin.
The few who do advocate for neurodiversity within their organisations often find themselves overwhelmed, carrying the burden of systemic shortcomings. These champions, while dedicated and passionate, cannot compensate for the lack of broad, institutional support. I have had people reach out more times than I care to admit where the helpers are the ones over-burdened and forsaking their own welfare to help others.
Moving from Words to Actions
For organisations to genuinely support neurodiversity, they must move beyond empty boxes and take concrete actions. This includes:
Implementing Comprehensive Support Systems: Develop and maintain support systems that address the specific needs of neurodivergent individuals. This could involve specialised training programmes, continuous mentorship, and accessible resources.
Creating Inclusive Environments: Foster an environment where neurodivergent employees feel safe, valued, and able to thrive. This means actively listening to their feedback and making necessary adjustments.
Ensuring Continuous Improvement: Regularly review and refine inclusion strategies to ensure they remain effective and relevant. This involves ongoing education and adaptation to new insights and challenges.
The Path Forward
It’s clear that meaningful change requires more than just words. Organisations must demonstrate their commitment to neurodiversity through tangible actions and sustained efforts. This shift from lip service to substance will not only benefit neurodivergent individuals but also enrich the entire workplace, fostering a culture of genuine inclusivity and support.
In the book I may never release, You Are Your Only Limit, I have dived deep into my experiences as a neurodivergent individual in a neurotypical world in the hope of sparking a conversation or thought in others. Through it, I aim to prompt discussion, reflect on my journey, and share strategies for creating a better world for neurodiversity. It may well serve, if I ever dare to release it and escape the self-doubt about the idea, as a call to action for individuals and organisations alike to prioritise substance over lip service and commit to real, lasting change.
By focusing on substance, we can create environments where all individuals, regardless of their neurological makeup, can succeed and thrive. Let’s move beyond hollow promises and take the necessary steps to build a truly inclusive future.
Just my thoughts.
Comments