OFF SCRIPT: The Blue Light Blur #4
- Tobey Alexander
- Feb 23
- 5 min read

Competence as camouflage
When difference makes you suspicious
Very early in my policing career, I was noticed for being different.
Not disruptive. Not difficult. Just different.
I preferred my own company. I worked quietly. I pushed to get my work done without much interest in banter or messing around. In a culture that values familiarity and social ease, that alone was enough to raise eyebrows.
I was asked outright if I was a mole. The timing didn’t help. The Secret Policeman exposé had just happened when I joined, I was young, insisted on using my own pen, and didn’t socialise in the expected ways. In an already suspicious environment, difference tends to put the culture on the back foot.
I tried, at first, to lean into the social side. But I had already done three years at university, and I hadn’t enjoyed that element there either. Eventually, the attention faded.
Not because I blended in, but because I became good at what I did.
Even when I was part of a close-knit team, that difference never really disappeared. I enjoyed the camaraderie, but I inhabited it differently. During the Olympics, while we waited between deployments, most of the team would be swapping football opinions, playing cards, laughing and joking in the vehicles. I was just as content sitting quietly with a book or listening to music through an MP3 player as we drove between tasks.
I had my mates. I wasn’t isolated. But I was always the odd one, and I was fine with that. For a while, the team were too.
What unsettled people wasn’t my distance, but their inability to read me. And that discomfort rarely came from those alongside me. It came from those in positions who expected familiarity to look a certain way, and didn’t know what to do when it didn’t.
Buying acceptance with output
Once competence became visible, it replaced suspicion.
Going above and beyond became the currency of acceptance. If you didn’t prove yourself on the football pitch or through socialising out of hours, you did it by being operationally indispensable.
Almost as if the unspoken logic was simple. If you’re not taking part in those things, you must have more time. And if you have more time, it can be taken.
I learned that lesson quickly.
Just after finishing my probation, I broke my ankle on duty. Nothing dramatic. A poor landing while climbing into a school that had been broken into. Six weeks of recovery followed, and by the time I returned, I felt like I had something to make up for.
So I did.
Quietly. Consistently. In the background.
I worked on projects for long periods and let others take the credit. I solved problems that weren’t mine to own. I absorbed work without expectation of recognition, believing that usefulness would eventually translate into belonging.
Being valuable without being protected
I remember turning up to a meeting with a Detective Chief Inspector carrying six A3 sheets laid out as a flowchart. I had connected someone on my patch to a network of higher-profile criminality through pattern recognition and link analysis.
Instead of interest, I was told off for doing too much.
Eventually, I was allowed to investigate the element, but with heavy caveats. When I explained how I’d built the picture, I was looked at as if my thinking was somehow inappropriate. Unusual. Excessive.
When that same DCI later asked whether I’d consider going into CID, I laughed. It was never a path for me.
I learned early that expressing an adverse opinion, even lightly, has a long memory, particularly when it lands with someone holding rank or influence.
I didn’t recognise it as neurodivergence at the time. I just saw it as a pattern.
Complex local problems were what I enjoyed. Deep work. Systems. Connections. I worked extra hours routinely, built cases no one had asked for, and spent more time in the office and inside a police car than I did with my family.
At the time, it felt like commitment.
In hindsight, it was erosion.
When excellence stops being rewarded
It wasn’t until I moved into armed policing that the pattern became harder to ignore.
I wrote revision cards and shared them with everyone. I helped others prepare for interviews and promotions I was applying for myself. I assumed that effort would be recognised, or at least respected.
Instead, I began to notice how competence can quietly become something others rely on without always recognising its cost.
I applied for a temporary promotion and was told that while my written application was the strongest, the role was being given to someone else. The reason given was that I had already shown I could carry additional responsibility, and they needed to give someone else the opportunity to demonstrate that.
The irony was hard to miss.
I had taken on extra responsibility voluntarily. Now I was being told I had done too much to be rewarded for it.
The same echo appeared again later when I positioned myself for the Chief Firearms Instructor role. I applied. I interviewed. I passed the course. I passed the exams. I developed myself deliberately for the role.
I was told this was unfair.
Unfair because others hadn’t done those things, and my preparation meant they couldn’t access the role. Once again, I was told I had done everything right, but that this somehow made me the problem.
When camouflage stops working
In the beginning, I believed competence would buy acceptance.
Later, I knew it never would.
No matter how much I tried to engage socially, I remained different in how I kept myself. Favours went to those with alignments. Influence sat with those inside circles. Influence often seemed to favour those already inside established circles, because they were already part of the informal economy of the place.
I was outside those circles. And because of that, I didn’t owe favours, didn’t trade allegiances, and didn’t belong to the quiet networks that protect people when things matter.
That made me useful.
It also made me expendable.
I could be relied upon repeatedly, drained of effort, and then politely declined when it came time for recognition. When I finally challenged that pattern, made it visible, and pushed back, something crystallised.
I had to ask myself whether this was a fight I was prepared to keep having, over and over again, as I always had.
Or whether it was time to look outward.
If any of this sounds familiar - if you've ever worked twice as hard to be taken half as seriously, if you've ever solved a problem nobody asked you to solve and been looked at like you were the problem - then you already know what I'm describing. You've been doing it too.
The camouflage was still working, but it was no longer protecting anything.
The harder question, the one I avoided for years, was this:
If competence is the only thing keeping you safe, what happens when you can no longer sustain it?
.png)

It’s funny reading this Gav, I almost thought it was written about me. I can empathise with a lot of what you’ve written, I never felt like I belonged, but yet the Police became such an important part of my identity, something I really struggled with after retirement. I look back at team photographs, especially social ones and recently noticed that I was always standing at the back, present, but always feeling like an outsider. I think as I got older I stopped caring so much about acceptance and became more of an observer of that culture from the sidelines